Character Studio. NURBS - Maya. Decrypt Max Script In 3ds. A human-memoribility domain name length should be maximum chars of 9 as well as brand-friendly. Domain name choosing is important to maximize search engine-referred traffic. Would it be too much asked to build in a pass/passphrase to hash conversion, to get the 128-bit key? Maybe with help of the RC4 script by Rajat? 1 - get pass/passphrase e.g. There are two flavors of the scripts I posted: The control/selection encryption uses markers around the IV, because its presence indicates, that we have encrypted text (and so plaintexts must not start with _ 8-digit hexnum/_). En/decrypting AHK variables don’t need this, because there are separate functions for encryption and for decryption. You have to choose one policy in your unified function: with or w/o markers around the IV. You have a mixture. But, why do you want to bring these into one function and control it with global variables? So the user needs to include only one function? But it will be slower, having an extra if statement in the innermost loop, or larger than the two original functions, if you separate the code for encryption and decryption. Also, global variables are confusing, error prone and considered bad style. I would instead add an extra parameter, default to 0. If it is nonzero, perform encryption, otherwise decryption (and this way there is no need for the markers around the IV). A global key is dangerous: somebody might try to use that variable for something else. You have to use as awkward key names as possible, but still, it is avoidable with parameters, as my functions are written. To fix your code as it is now, just leave out 6 lines after 'else; decryption`n {', since you already checked the validity of the IV. The next line should trim 12 chars instead of 8. Also the second line above 'else; decryption' should initialize L with the markers araound it, because when you check the presence of the IV, you assume that the markers are there. No, you convinced me, but the reason I wanted the pass conversion and use seperate from the function(s), was that I wanted to change this: e:= encrypt('I love you!' ,'k') d:= decrypt(e,'k') Into this: setpass('k') e:= encrypt('I love you!' ) d:= decrypt(e) which seamed safer to me, since in the script there would only be a call for the pass once, instead of everytime as it is now, so the script that borrowed it as an inclusion could be scattered with the pass. • It is anything but difficult to utilize. • Has more than 2 million serial keys. Youtube letoeltes. • It offers applications that are as of now initiate. But this would ofcourse be best: setpass('k') e:= crypt('I love you!' ,1) d:= crypt(e) I'll see if I can get it to work, thanks for your script! Multiple - true, hadn't thought of that:oops: ok, forget everything I said. Ok, then how about adding the randomization of the keyname (which is a global variable, a threat, like you stated) to the script, with your true-random-from-diff-sys-variables function to come? This is a function that is needed anyway, since the system time alone is not enough. Moreover, if you need multiple passes, you also need multiple keys, the ones in global memory, so, good randomization of their names would add to the security. What would the chance be if someone would do an encrypted compilation of a script with your function included, that it could be cracked (practically zero I think).
0 Комментарии
Оставить ответ. |
АвторНапишите что-нибудь о себе. Не надо ничего особенного, просто общие данные. Архивы
Март 2019
Категории |